were westcott and hort jesuits
This cannot be any text resting solely on our own judgment, even if we were not too inexperienced to make one; but it must be supported by a clear and obvious preponderance of evidence. The Jesuits believed that they could use textual criticism to help them win Protestants back to the fold, by replacing the King James Bible. 19-20), Oh, the weakness of my faith compared with that of others! Every statement of language allows for a certain latitude in interpreting or translating. Let us examine what Westcott and Hort actually believed. Walter Martin, The Kingdom of the Cults Revised, Updated, and Expanded Anniversary Edition, Bethany House Publishers, Minneapolis, Minnesota 1997, p. 125. This should not be a surprise for both Vaticanus (Manuscript B) and Sinaiticus (a Aleph) are Roman Catholic in origin. (This they later circulated under pledge of secrecy within the company of N.T. But the mind was set by these so-called scholars to trash the Textus Receptus.(Hunt). Wilhelm DeWette (1780-1849) applied it to Deuteronomy. The Hebrew texts, Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia and Biblia Hebraica Quinta, were used for preparing the latest version of this translation. Johann Eichhorn (1752-1827) expanded the concept by dividing up Genesis and part of Exodus. Since 1994, the New World Translation of the Holy ScripturesWith References has been included in the Watchtower Library on CD-ROM. It bears traces of careless transcription on every page. (1) KING JAMES BIBLE. As you can see, even then, Catholics, like modern publishers, had to rework and rewrite their falsities many times over, and STILL did not get it right! for private distribution only. Simon is the forerunner of modern Biblical criticism.(Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. [42][43], In 1989, a Translation Services Department was established at the world headquarters of Jehovah's Witnesses, overseen by the Writing Committee of the Governing Body. In other words, W&H deliberately used corrupt sources KNOWING that virtually all other texts contained the same truths as were found in the Textus Receptus! Heresies and blasphemies of Wescott & Hort - Jesus -is-Lord.com Not only this, but: The Rheims-Douay and the King James Version were published LESS than THIRTY years apart..The Rheims-Douay has been REPEATEDLY changed to APPROXIMATE the King James. Julius Robert Mantey, Depth Exploration in the New Testament, Vantage Press, 1980, R. Rhodes, The Challenge of the Cults and New Religions, The Essential Guide to Their History, Their Doctrine, and Our Response, Zondervan, 2001, p. 94.
